Comparing how the experts and ordinary users use the internet safely

Nowadays you can find within a few seconds more safety information than it would need for a lifetime. And while all the security methods is large, it is not always usable since it is often difficult for the user to know what is a priority and why. Questions like ‘Why ordinary users make these choices and not others?’ and “How effectively communicated to ordinary users correct methods of security experts? ‘ is the heart of a new study entitled “… no one can invade my mind ‘: Comparing security methods by experts and ordinary users’, presented by Google last week at the Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security. 231 experts on security and 294 ordinary Internet users answer questions about what they do in order to use the internet safely. The company’s objective was to compare and contrast the responses of the two groups in order to understand the differences and their existence causes. The top 5 safety methods by experts and ordinary users: Below the results of research on security methods preferred by experts and ordinary users. Google has asked each participant to name three methods:

The top 5 methods of security experts:
1. Install Software Update
2. Use unique passwords
3. Use double authentication
4. Use tough passwords
5. Use code management program The top 5 methods of security than ordinary users: 1. Use antivirus software 2. Use tough passwords 3.Frequent change passwords 4. Visit websites that only know five. Do not share personal information

The common element is carefully managed passwords Clearly, careful management of passwords is a priority for both groups. But approaches differ. Experts in safety heavily depend on passwords management programs, ie services that store and protect all passwords a user in one place. Experts said they use passwords management programs in some of the bills, three times more often than ordinary users. An expert told us, ‘passwords management plans change everything, because allowing the use of difficult and unique codes’. On the other hand, only 24% of ordinary users said they use passwords management programs in some of the bills as opposed to 73% of the experts. The results show that this is due to lack of awareness about the benefits of code management programs and / or lack of confidence in them. ‘I’m trying to memorize my passwords, because no one can invade my mind’, he told us a normal user. Basic differences: software updates and security software antivirus Apart from a few overlaps, the top responses of security specialists and non- special was very different. 35% of the security specialists and only 2% of ordinary users said that the installation of software updates was one ap’tis leading security practices. Experts recognize the benefits of the updates while ordinary users not only not clear to them but worried about the possible risks of updates to the software. One user told us: “I do not know whether the software update is always secure. What if downloading malicious software? “And” automatic software updates are not safe in my opinion, as it can be misused to update malware. “Meanwhile, 42% of ordinary users compared with just 7% of the specific Safety indicated that the antivirus software is one of the top three things to do to stay safe online. Experts have recognized the advantages of the antivirus software, but expressed concerns that can give users a false sense of security, since it is not a panacea. The US company encourages everyone to read the full investigation, to adopt leading practices of specific security and also check her advice to keep safe their information to Google. As he concludes: “Overall, our findings underscore the fundamental misconceptions about basic Internet security practices. Software updates, for example, are the security zones Internet: make safer. And yet, many ordinary users, not just ignore them although they are best practice, but also worried that software updates are a security risk. No practice in any list does not make users less secure. However, there is clearly room for improvement in how safety best practices proteraiopoiountai and communicated in the vast majority of ordinary users. “

Related Articles

Back to top button